this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2024
148 points (97.4% liked)

World News

39023 readers
3019 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

publicado de forma cruzada desde: https://lemmy.smeargle.fans/post/146590

HN Discussion

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 19 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I think forced arbitration should be illegal. I’m suing an old employer. They had an arbitration clause hidden in the contract. It just allows them to ignore federal Eeoc laws since they can just arbitrate it.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

It just allows them to ignore federal Eeoc laws since they can just arbitrate it.

That sounds suspect. EEOC is federal. I find it doubtful a company can simply choose to opt-out of those laws.

[–] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

They can. The Feds can sue on behalf of you but thy rarely do. They admitted in writing they ignore the ada since they can’t be sue. Judge still forced it to arbitration.

[–] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee -2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

When I talk about working with senators. This is one of the topics I’m discussing. Federal laws should not be forced into arbitration. It allows companies to abuse federal law

[–] Humanius@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Personally I don't think forced arbitration should exist for any law. It's a way for large corporations to avoid legal responsibility.
I always find it odd how easy it seems to be to just sign your rights away in the US.

[–] youngGoku@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Agreed. Forced arbitration is so shady...

[–] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee -5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Arbitration should only be allowed when you get something for it. They’ll give you 10k for going to arbitration or something. Otherwise it’s just abusive or you get to pick the arbitrator.

[–] Humanius@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Signing your rights away should never be possible, even if you get something in return. Allowing that is just making the system ripe for abuse.

At what point would you say you've met the threshold of something being valuable enough for forced arbitration to be allowable?