107
submitted 2 months ago by booja@booja.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

There's not plenty of land with infrastructure to support people. That many houses also needs more schools, hospitals, roads, gas stations, grocery stores, etc

It's not just houses we need to build.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

There’s not plenty of land with infrastructure to support people.

You may not have understood my point. The land I'm talking about already has infrastructure; you just have to bulldoze the houses that are already there and replace them with multifamily.

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

Schools only have a set amount of space and hospitals a set amount of beds.

Bulldoze a neighbourhood of 500 detached units housing 1500 people, 500 of which are children, to build towers which can house 6000, 2000 of which are children, you will then need to bulldoze the school which was there to be able to build another school 4x as large or find vacant land to build extra schools.

More people = more infrastructure not just houses.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

IDGAF; it's still infinitely better than sprawl.

this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
107 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

6940 readers
386 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Regions


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


👒 Lifestylecoming soon


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Other


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here:

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No porn.
  4. No Ads / Spamming.


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS