this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2024
11 points (62.8% liked)

Showerthoughts

29819 readers
743 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
vatlark@lemmy.world
forkball@lemmy.world
quinten@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
11
The future of mobile devices? (infosec.pub)
submitted 7 months ago by dotslashme@infosec.pub to c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world
18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I wonder if the charging port on mobile devices will go the way of the 3.5mm jack and be replaced with Qi and other wireless charging protocols. I also wonder if we will be forced into Bluetooth for all extension devices we used to connect to usb-c.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] huginn@feddit.it 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Thanks for linking the actual directive.

To be fair: it wasn't "some press release" - it was the official statement on the matter by Parliament.

Quoting from the directive:

When preparing the delegated acts referred to in this Article with respect to radio equipment capable of being recharged by means of wired charging, as well as with respect to radio equipment capable of being recharged by means other than wired charging, the Commission shall take into account the degree of market acceptance of the technical specifications under consideration, the resulting consumer convenience and the extent of the reduction of environmental waste and market fragmentation that can be expected from such technical specifications.

Given that they're focused on reduction of waste and reduction of market fragmentation there's definitely a question mark over only QI based charging. I think they've left themselves significant latitude to smack down any attempts to fully go to wireless charging without a port.

Remains to be seen if they will.

[–] BorgDrone@lemmy.one 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Given that they’re focused on reduction of waste and reduction of market fragmentation there’s definitely a question mark over only QI based charging.

I don't see how you can get that from the text. The way I read it, wired and wireless charging are separate. There is nothing in the directive that mandates one should be used over the other. They explicitly require USB-C for wired charging, but do not put any requirements on wireless, as there doesn't seem to be any significant fragmentation on the wireless side (i.e. no need to enforce a standard if everyone already agrees on a standard).

[–] huginn@feddit.it 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

My quote explicitly ties wired and wireless charging together into the document. They left it open in saying "we're not establishing any rules yet but these go hand in hand and we'll immediately start looking at wireless charging in the context of e-waste".

[–] BorgDrone@lemmy.one 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

My quote explicitly ties wired and wireless charging together into the document.

It just says they are keeping an eye on developments in both wireless and wired charging standards. Not a word on requiring either on any device.