this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2024
783 points (98.5% liked)

Political Memes

5209 readers
3145 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

How about this factoid:

From the invention of agriculture, depending on the fertility of the soil, one farmer could generally sustain 3-5 people.

Today, a single American farmer feeds, on average, 166 people. There are of course nations that don't reach that productivity, as there are some that exceed it, but America takes pride at being the best nation ever so let's look at that a little more.

Somehow, though we do indeed have more flashing lights and cool noises than ever before, that independent farmer is going extinct, and a very large percentage of America in particular and the world at large lives in quiet desperation.

Now why is that, exactly? And why can't that farmer just feed 83 people and not work themselves to death to still barely keep the bank off their back?

And why would they need a subsidy to survive even if they are feeding the full 166?

In case you ever wonder why rural America is getting a "bit mad," maybe think about that a little more.

And maybe start talking to them and offering actual solutions, because right now they're mostly just hearing leftists bitching about ending corn subsidies and taking their guns, and rightoids telling them if they hate the right people it will all work out.

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

leftists do sometimes try rural organizing.

youre talking about libs. we hate them too.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe -5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

How's that organizing going? It a popular thing to do? Anarchism taking back ground lost to fake libertarians?

And feel free to tell the "leftists" around here that self defense and the tools necessary for such is a human right.

[–] sparkle@lemm.ee 12 points 4 months ago

A large portion of leftists here are very pro-gun, considering unarmed minorities & workers are a lot easier to oppress than armed minorities & workers and all...

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

uh, youve never met one if you think we give a shit about your guns.

edit: some of us would ask serious questions about your anti air and anti armor capacity. I dont know enough about guns to do either.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I liked your earlier comment, but it's weird how quickly you got snide

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It's a theme, they usually mean well.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 4 months ago

I don't see how this conflicts with what they said at all? Yes, socialism would help the rural population too. Perhaps even more so.

[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.de 4 points 4 months ago

What also is very weird, is the fact, that the entire agriculture industry is only "profitable" because we directly give the farmers money. Which other market is profitable only because of subsidies? This directly kills smaller farms(and this also has an impact on rural areas) and destroys the entire industry.