this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023
1666 points (88.0% liked)

Technology

59466 readers
3354 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rog@lemmy.one 148 points 1 year ago (11 children)

I dont know why anyone would leave chrome and land on something like brave.

If youre ditching chrome, which you should, go to an actual different browser and use Firefox.

[–] hayes_@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Personal anecdote:

When I initially decided to drop Chrome, I moved to Brave because - as a chromium-based browser - it supported the same set of extensions I’d grown accustomed to.

That being said, the crypto stuff weirded me out enough that, once I’d weaned myself off the extensions, I switched to Firefox.

[–] Justice@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

What extensions does chrome have which are useful that Firefox doesn’t?

My only recurring issue with Firefox, which may have been fixed I dunno, is it for some reason it “isn’t officially supported” or whatever exact wording to use hardware security keys (like yubikey, which I use on every account that allows it). It’s only certain websites that don’t want to work though. Like google, Microsoft and many others were fine but I think paypal didn’t want to work properly but it does work on Edge, Chrome, probably Brave. Overall annoying as fuck at times but I deal with it to be out of Google’s-world

[–] hayes_@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Shrug, it’s been a while and I don’t remember which affected my decision at the time.

[–] anamethatisnt@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

You can probably get around your paypal problems by telling them your Firefox is Chrome.
https://github.com/ray-lothian/UserAgent-Switcher

[–] bloodsangre7@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Only one I missed was PushBullet, it was the easiest way to text from browser and get articles from phone/computer. Nothing I've tried on Firefox has worked as well

[–] Zeus@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

at the time; the great suspender (although that's dead on chrome now too)

project naptha is the only one that has stuck with me since i left chrome, and has no firefox alternative to my knowledge

[–] Anaralah_Belore223@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Also, if you going to completely ditch chrome/chromium, also stop using Electron apps (which have chromium/Chromium Embedded Framework on them!)

[–] ominouslemon@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

That's gonna be quite difficult, unfortunately

[–] HaggierRapscallier@feddit.nl 4 points 1 year ago

What if the apps aren't for online use?

[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago

Streaming services seem to lower bitrate when I’m using Firefox vs Brave, so Brave is my go to for streaming.

I use Firefox for everything else.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Chromium has metric shit tons of work done that seems to perform great. What I would love to see is for Mozilla to fork Chromium, staff it with enough people to maintain it, add/remove the features they feel are appropriate/inappropriate, and thus reuse the tons of free work Google and others have already done. As a software engineer, I don't buy the argument that it's easier to correctly implement every new web feature anew than maintaining a fork. Every large org that ships anything based on Android for example maintains a fork of an even bigger codebase. It's not as complicated as people make it out to be. It's not a new problem and there are strategies to manage it. If Mozilla does this, they'll be able to play an active role in steering by far the biggest rendering engine's direction, instead of playing opposition with no stake in it. Now downvote away! 😄

[–] tate@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The more market share chrome based browsers have, the easier it is for google to inflict their agenda for the internet on everyone. If firefox didnt exist, every web developer would be optimizing their sites only for chrome, and responding quickly to any change google wants to make.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It really doesn't matter what Firefox'es codebase is though. To a web developer it's a black box. It may as well be a bowl of COBOL spaghetti. So long as enough people use it and it behaves differently to a web developer than Google's Chromium or Chrome, the goal you mentioned is achieved. This is why I don't buy this argument.

[–] Brainsploosh@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I use it as my hardened Firefox doesn't play well with some government and bank sites

[–] whofearsthenight@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I was using Chrome as a secondary because unfortunately "designed for Chrome" is a thing now, and got sick of Google's bullshit and thought I was doing better by going to Brave. Unfortunately, it quickly became clear that Brave has its own large ethical holes.

[–] ominouslemon@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

When I need a Chromium browser I use Vivaldi. I quite like it!

[–] EricHill78@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Ungoogled Chromium is a great option for a back up. It's lightweight and works well

I am using Brave mainly because of its superb YouTube support - It has a built in ad block, can download videos offline and play minimized. Is there any way I can achieve this with any other browser? I would switch immediately.

[–] chris2112@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I've tried Firefox several times but always end up back on chromium due to compatibility; a lot of sites don't play well with anything but chrome anymore and this is very much something intentionally caused by Google, who have basically taken a page out of Microsoft's playbook but with a much more mature product that is going to be substantially harder to replace then IE was

[–] exonac@feddit.de -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Brave is the only browser I know that can play youtube videos in the background on mobile. Please tell me another browser that can do that. The UX is just really good.

[–] ominouslemon@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Why not use NewPipe?

[–] srecnimacek@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Vivaldi can do that, there is an option in settings. Firefox mobile does that with an addon.