this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023
187 points (93.1% liked)

Technology

59149 readers
2409 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Bill Gates-backed nuclear contender Terra Power aims to build dozens of UK reactors::A Bill Gates-backed clean energy player is hoping to build dozens of nuclear reactors in the UK and will compete with global rivals.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

General rule of thumb - if the current UK government is in favor of something it's probably a really terrible idea.

[–] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Dismissing all ideas of those you don't like is a stupid idea and leads to you becoming dissociated from the views of the population at large but you do you I guess

At least break ideas down into categories small enough that you form a viewpoint on it to compare to theirs, as it's near impossible to find a group you agree or disagree with on everything

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's called, "paying attention". I've been watching these crooks dismantle the UK for the past 13 years.

[–] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If 90% of their ideas are stupid, you'd still be missing out on a tonne of at least ok ideas

Sounds like you're not paying attention but instead thinking you know best and so there's no need to pay attention to anything else

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you want to filter through a mountain of bullshit in order to possibly find a few OK ideas, you're free to waste your time. You sound like you really don't have anything interesting to say but you'd like to tone police anyway.

[–] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not like you're looking retrospectively... You sound like a late teen who thinks they've got the world all figured out and so have shut everything out, including the things that would make you realise that you actually haven't

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Counterpoint: I've actually done the research on this, have you?

[–] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What research? On how every single idea the Tories have had in the past 13 years has been bad with no redeeming features, as I think at least the one in this post certainly has at least shades of good.

If you are suddenly bringing the original post in after shunning it to moan about politics then it's not much of a counterpoint as it just goes to show that you're ignorant to what's actually going on around you

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

So enlighten me.

[–] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm not suggesting that a SMR can't be built, I'm saying that they're a massive waste of money, unless you hold RR stock.

[–] Zron@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

SMRs are great for decentralization of the power grid.

Which makes the viability of renewables like wind and solar much more viable, as you can have the reactor for each mini grid throttle down based on current renewable yield, and throttle back up when the sun goes down or the wind stops.

It also means that issues like Texas had in the winter of 2021 would be a lot smaller in magnitude, as having one SMR and renewables go offline would only cause a local power outage, instead of entire cities suddenly being without heat or power.

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can't find any sources that support SMRs being used as peaker plants, conventional nuclear certainly can't behave this way. Do you have any links?

[–] min0nim@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can do this but it makes them even more expensive, because you’ve built an expensive plant for operational capacity that you don’t use.

We should be load following with storage, not nukes.

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Do you have a source on that? I can't find anything supporting SMRs for peak use. How quickly can they come online? How much notice to take offline? How long to reach peak generation?

[–] gnygnygny@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Why would you get a small unit when you can get big one.

[–] totallynotfbi@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Well, this Tera Power project is also for SMRs...