388
submitted 2 months ago by MRLimcon@lemmy.ml to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] hangonasecond@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

The semantics is that downloading is copying something from one computer system to another. Nothing about intent or permanence or whether it's a temp/cache file or not. If you did not download the file, you cannot have seen it.

Whether you meant to do something or not does not change the action. The colloquial use of the word downloading to mean something different from streaming or browsing does not change the fundamental action.

In the case of WhatsApp, which is specifically in question here, it doesn't "cache" images in a temporary folder. It saves the images to your devices media folders in their own library. So even by your definition, they're being downloaded. Now, this is a setting which is on by default so maybe an individual doesn't realise. It doesn't mean they're not downloading the content.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 months ago

The semantics is that downloading is copying something from one computer system to another. Nothing about intent or permanence or whether it’s a temp/cache file or not. If you did not download the file, you cannot have seen it.

i mean yeah, but we're also talking about a legal case here, where the semantics of how it got there also matter. It'd be insane for someone else to sabotage you by committing illegal acts in your home for instance, and then getting you arrested because you were merely around them. Part of the semantics here are governmental.

If you did not download the file, you cannot have seen it.

this was exactly my point. The original comment here was completely ignoring that possibility, could have been for good reason, i have no idea, but unless people clarify, i assume the worst.

Whether you meant to do something or not does not change the action. The colloquial use of the word downloading to mean something different from streaming or browsing does not change the fundamental action.

I mean i suppose if you accidentally downloaded something, that would mean that you did technically download it, just not intentionally, but if someone else downloads something, then you quite literally did not download it. That's my point here.

In the case of WhatsApp, which is specifically in question here, it doesn’t “cache” images in a temporary folder. It saves the images to your devices media folders in their own library. So even by your definition, they’re being downloaded. Now, this is a setting which is on by default so maybe an individual doesn’t realise. It doesn’t mean they’re not downloading the content.

So, if i'm understanding you correctly here, and correct me if im wrong, because i don't use whatsapp (i use better apps) whatsapp has no concept of a download cache, and instead of using a cache, EVERY image that you have EVER been sent, from ANYBODY who contacts you, is being stored and put into a single folder somewhere on your device without the intention of it ever being removed automatically?

Even in this case, they are not downloading it. It is in fact, being automatically downloaded however, since that would technically not qualify as a cache. Ignoring the fact that this is a pretty stupid decision for the developers to make, considering how easy it would be to "zip bomb" someone using this. This also does not guarantee that something downloaded to your device, is something that you would even know about. And also, like i said, is also something the user themselves is not downloading.

I would still argue pretty explicitly, that this doesn't mean that they explicitly downloaded the content, unless they knew that it was downloaded at some point, or in this case, regularly accessed it i suppose. But the semantics here is based on the fact that something was downloaded to your device, doesn't mean that you did it, or that you know about it.

this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2024
388 points (97.5% liked)

World News

37383 readers
2994 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS