this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
52 points (91.9% liked)

World News

38554 readers
2551 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Both NATO and the EU want to spend a €100 billion on defense — and that’s leading to clashes between the two Brussels-based institutions.

The European Union is donning its camouflage pants and flexing its muscles on defense. NATO isn’t happy. 

For years, the two Brussels-based institutions have barely communicated when it comes to defense, except for some military cooperation in areas like the Balkans — because they haven’t had to. Defense was NATO’s turf (it is a military alliance, after all), while the EU dealt with trade, farming, climate change and things like standards for heritage cheeses. 

It was summed up by a catchphrase popular in military circles: “The U.S. fights, the U.N feeds, the EU funds.”

That’s now changing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 4 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The Commission has also presented a European Defence Industrial Strategy alongside a cash pot of at least €1.5 billion, aimed at getting the EU to finally begin punching its weight when it comes to defense.

Spurred by the war in Ukraine and by the potential return to the White House of Donald Trump, the bloc wants its members to start thinking of their own futures when it comes to defense, one in which they don't rely overly on the United States.

"We need to build such a sustainable financial instrument if European security should be protected" Tomáš Kopečný, the Czech envoy for the reconstruction of Ukraine and a former deputy defense minister, told POLITICO.

In a letter Stoltenberg sent to von der Leyen Jan. 26, seen by POLITICO, he warned "I am concerned about the potential overlap with existing NATO activities," adding: "In particular, I would be worried if the EU were to move into standard setting for munitions."

In a February speech, von der Leyen said a “new European defense mindset” would be urgently needed, because “we do not have the control over elections or decisions in other parts of the world.”

"On the day of the invasion, you and I stood side-by-side and delivered a clear message of support for the Ukrainian people," Stoltenberg recalled, casually omitting the other person who was also on stage at the time — European Council President Charles Michel.


The original article contains 1,685 words, the summary contains 236 words. Saved 86%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!