this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2024
954 points (98.5% liked)

memes

10443 readers
2486 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JCreazy@midwest.social 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Lemmy doesn't like it for a reason.

[–] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Im a massive proponent of FOSS, But I have not heard a single sustainable FOSS model for maintaining free search engines. It just takes so much capital to operate.

I think a paid model is much better than a privacy disrespecting / ad driven one.

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

if its individually paid, you don't have privacy.

[–] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

It is if they dont store search queries, which they claim they dont. I have no reason to distrust them.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

FOSS and paid are not mutually exclusive, but Kagi is not FOSS and of dubious transparency/trustworthiness.

Also Kagi is not operating a search engine, but a search aggregator mostly dependent on Google. They don't need much upfront capital to operate.

An actual search indexer competitive with Google is too expensive to be profitable without (tens of) millions of paid users or hundreds of millions of free ones (i.e. bing and maaaaybe yandex?).

True google alternatives are therefore only going to come out of big capital (MSFT), or less likely a government (EU?) funded company. There might be an argument to be made for decentralized search as well, but the only actual contender in that field right now is a crypto thing that probably relies mostly on bing/google. Still, a decentralized open indexer may actually make some sense in theory.

[–] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Right, but nobody hates google because ofits results. They hate that its privacy invasive.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net -2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

If I wanted to pay to talk to people, I'd go to a therapist.