Linux

48317 readers

1280 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

103

How is MX Linux reigning #1 on Distrowatch? (lemm.ee)

submitted 7 months ago by zyratoxx@lemm.ee to c/linux@lemmy.ml

68 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Please don't get me wrong, this is not meant to be rude slander. MX Linux is not a bad Distro at all (even tho I've always opted for Debian instead) and peops are free to use what suits them best.

But compared to other Distros (like Arch, Fedora, Ubuntu, Debian or Mint) there doesn't seem to be much excitement about it. I hardly see articles about MX and I have barely seen people outing themselves as MX users which makes me wonder:

Are MX users just low key quiet, am I escaping their presence or is there a different reason for MX' high HPD score?

Btw: feel free to take a shot every time I write MX :p

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

No shit how? I actually used it because of damn distrowatch, it is solid but damn Debian based. Had to switch because the Nextcloud version was outdated and didnt work with an updated server.

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Had to switch because the Nextcloud version was outdated and didnt work with an updated server.

And there was no flatpak, snap, or appimage?

Half of my packages are from nix unstable. Stable base + bleeding edge userland.

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yes there was but I was literally installing a distro recommended on Distrowatch, so you can estimate my knowledge back then.

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm currently running MX because I went to DW and checked what's popular. It wasn't the only one I hopped through, but that's how I first learned about it.

Did you check out the MX package installer at any point? It's got flatpak integration, but I'm wondering if it's obvious for beginners.

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 3 points 7 months ago

I have no idea, I may have to give it another try.

Currently experimenting with atomic CentOS though, and rpm-ostree always wins

[–] zyratoxx@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I mean, if it is just the client app you could see if the Flatpak version works better. ^^

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 2 points 7 months ago

The Flatpak lacks Filemanager integration but thats pretty okay