Technology

59422 readers

2978 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

284

Spurred by Teen Girls, States Move to Ban Deepfake Nudes (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 6 months ago by pro_grammer@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world

67 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 40 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (5 children)

This is probably not the best context but I find it crazy how fast the government will get involved if it involves lude content but children are getting mudered in school shootings and gun control is just a bridge too far.

[–] pro_grammer@programming.dev 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I think they act faster on those matters because, aside from being a very serious problem, they also have a conservative agenda.

Is very easy to say: "LOOK, WE ARE DOING THIS TO PROTECT YOUR CHILDREN FROM PEDOPHILES!!!"

But they can't just go and say "let's enforce gun safety on schools", because having a conservative voter reading "gun safety" will already go bad for them.

They know they are sacrificing the well being of children by not acting on the school shootings, but for them is just the price of a few lives to stay in power.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Are quaaludes even still available in 2024?

Or did you mean to say "lewd"?

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world -5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

If only their were context clues... oh wait you're just being a jerk.

[–] NerdyApex@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Did you mean "there were"?

[–] locuester@lemmy.zip 6 points 6 months ago

If only they’re wear context clues…

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago

Oh no I'ave disturbed the pedants.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Sorry can't help it; I'm an energy vampire and we tend to be jerks. Got it from my dad.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

There's no competing interests when it comes to protecting child from child sexual exploitation. When it comes to protecting them from guns, there is the competing interest of the second amendment.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago

Those shootings don’t happen in private schools.

Nudes happen in private schools.