this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
396 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

59440 readers
3637 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Beijing Superconductor (LK-99) Levitation Video Author Admits Fraud, Takes it Down::The author of one of the Billibilli videos posted as proof of LK-99's levitation capabilities has admitted that his posting was a hoax.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 42 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The original poster of one of the Billibilli videos circulating on the Internet and seemingly proving LK-99's levitation ability has come forward, and admitted his clip was a hoax.

The video in question is allegedly from the University of Science and Technology in Beijing and purports to show a small black substance floating in the air as it follows a magnet.

Whenever a claim as momentous and potentially civilization-changing such as "we've found the world's first room-temperature superconductor" is made, noise is bound to follow.

But even focusing on the hard science (which we want to be clear, replicable, and truthful) and moving on to the boundaries of peer-review scientific process, it becomes difficult to deal with the noise.

Neither the cooking time (how long at what temperatures the mixtures have to stay within a vacuum oven for LK-99 to be synthesized and whether there's thermal variation at any moment) nor the quench rate (the same, but when it needs to cool down) are, however, well-documented.

The video poster ultimately claimed that the experience of being a part of the noise had changed him, and that he'd be more cautious with his actions and words in the future.


I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Forestial@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] yiliu@informis.land 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Seems like a bad take. This is from the equivalent of some random YouTube video, unrelated to the original university & scientists.

You think it'd be possible to find a YouTube video with some bad science nonsense in it? Would that warrant a "fraud in the US, huh" comment?

Separately, science in China does have a fraud problem. But this video wasn't an example of that.

[–] Redditiscancer789@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean your example is still accurate. The person posting that video is a fraud, and if they live in America, "fraud in the US" would be most accurate as it singles out a specific person, as opposed to the statement I believe you are trying to make which would be don't judge the whole country by 1 person. Yet they didn't say that, they specifically say a fraud(singular) in China.

[–] Helluin@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i mean the point they were trying to make is pretty clear imo no need to dance around it so pedantically.

[–] Redditiscancer789@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Is it though or are you personally just projecting? Considering the language used.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago

They better be careful otherwise the world won't take them seriously anymore, oh wait.

[–] dbilitated@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

I felt bad for scanning the big list for replication results that weren't Chinese 😞

turns out I was right