this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2024
111 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37717 readers
417 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
rs5th@beehaw.org
Los@beehaw.org
coldredlight@beehaw.org
SemioticStandard@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social
remington@beehaw.org
111
GoToSocial is a new ActivityPub social network server for the Fediverse (github.com)
submitted 6 months ago by GadgeteerZA@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org
31 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

This service is still in Alpha release but is already deployable and usable, and federates with other Fediverse servers.

However, there is no "main" instance you go to join. The intention really is that you host your own instance for yourself and a few friends and family. To this end, it is designed to be very lightweight and will happily run on a Raspberry Pi or even a $5/pm VPS.

This is taking a very different approach from say Mastodon which has one main instance everyone could join, but then it sits with the issue that everyone joins there, and it becomes a bit "centralised". GoToSocial has been designed as lightweight for self-hosting, and also has a Docker image installation, so it makes it really easy for (and encourages) most people to host their own instance.

It seems to also be focussed very much around privacy (defaults to unlisted posts) and permission controls (for example, you have an option to post to mutual-only where both people follow each other). Also, by hosting your own service you set the rules, and you are also your own admin. You can choose to turn off likes, replies, boosts, etc as well. Being your own admin also means you can easily adjust the post length as well.

It does conform to the Mastodon API so apparently some Mastodon clients will also work fine with it.

See https://github.com/superseriousbusiness/gotosocial/

#technology #ActivityPub #GoToSocial

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheRealCharlesEames@lemm.ee 9 points 6 months ago (3 children)

So if I wanted to host my own mastodon for friends and family but found the installation process too difficult, does that make this the best route forward for me?

[–] remington@beehaw.org 10 points 6 months ago

You could reach out for help if you were running into problems. AskBeehaw would be an example for inquires. Also, there's nothing preventing anyone from asking for technical support at Beehaw's technology community which has the largest viewership on Beehaw.

[–] GadgeteerZA@beehaw.org 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They say it is less complex than Mastodon as well as lighter weight requirements. A Docker install is usually also easiest. So I'd say it is a better option to try for friends and family.

[–] leecalvin@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Setting up an app in docker is the easiest option, even more than just simply installing the binary?

[–] GadgeteerZA@beehaw.org 1 points 6 months ago

Yes, as there is full control over what is exposed or mapped for the app including network ports, and future updates don't get broken by inconsistent dependencies. I suppose if you run only one service on a machine and stick to standard ports for reverse proxying then maybe a binary install can be simpler. But if you want to install multiple apps ona server containers does become easier to manage and update.

[–] mbirth@lemmy.mbirth.uk 1 points 6 months ago

Pretty much, I think. I have it running on a Raspberry Pi 4 with docker-compose:

version: '3'

services:
  gotosocial:
    image: superseriousbusiness/gotosocial:latest
    restart: unless-stopped
    networks:
      - traefik-public
    environment:
      TZ: Europe/London
      GTS_HOST: xyz.example.com
      GTS_CONFIG_PATH: /gotosocial/storage/config.yaml
      GTS_DB_TYPE: sqlite
      GTS_DB_ADDRESS: /gotosocial/storage/sqlite.db
      GTS_LETSENCRYPT_ENABLED: "false"
      GTS_LETSENCRYPT_EMAIL_ADDRESS: ""
    volumes:
      - smb-gotosocial-data:/gotosocial/storage
    labels:
      traefik.enable: "true"
      traefik.http.routers.gotosocial.rule: Host(`xyz.example.com`)
      traefik.http.routers.gotosocial.entrypoints: websecure
      traefik.http.routers.gotosocial.tls: "true"
      traefik.http.routers.gotosocial.tls.certresolver: le
      traefik.http.services.gotosocial.loadbalancer.server.port: "8080"

volumes:
  smb-gotosocial-data:
    driver_opts:
      type: "smb3"
      device: "//mynas/docker/gotosocial/data"
      # Use nobrl to mitigate SQLite3 byte range locking issue on CIFS/SMB mounts
      o: "rw,nobrl,vers=3.1.1,addr=172.16.254.1,username=xxx,password=xxx,cache=loose,iocharset=utf8,noperm,hard"

networks:
  traefik-public:
    external: true