this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2024
10 points (54.6% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

6325 readers
18 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!

How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.

If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.

Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)

  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].

Rules:

1. NO POLITICS

Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.

2. Be civil.

Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...

Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.

5. No trolling.

This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Rooki@lemmy.world
JonsJava@lemmy.world
admiralpatrick@lemmy.world
lemann@lemmy.world
ptz@dubvee.org
10
??? (lemm.ee)
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by YIj54yALOJxEsY20eU@lemm.ee to c/unpopularopinion@lemmy.world
76 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

???

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] YIj54yALOJxEsY20eU@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

If the intention is to create an open, impartial forum for discussion and community interaction, then no such action should be taken.

If ensuring that users can't predominantly give negative feedback violates your understanding of the intention, surely the existence of moderators does as well.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'll just quote from my other comment:

Censorship is sometimes necessary (the classic example of yelling “fire!” in a theater) but always problematic. It should never be implemented in blanket policies but only in specific cases to drive specific outcomes (not to create a generally more positive atmosphere) - hence moderation and reporting.

And from just a moment ago:

YIj54yALOJxEsY20eU@lemm.ee >The existence of moderators suggests we can’t be trusted to say anything we want.

NaibofTabr@infosec.pub > The existence of moderators suggests that moderating conversation between humans requires contextual, circumstantial, individual and specific decision-making. That is, it requires human attention on each instance rather than broad conversation-affecting policies.

[–] YIj54yALOJxEsY20eU@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago

Fair enough lol sorry for splitting comments, I just wanted to sepererate this from the bog of my other comments. I will address that tomorrow when I'm a little more put together. I appreciate the discussion.