this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
294 points (86.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43974 readers
747 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I see it referenced constantly here, not quite as much on Reddit. I know what it means, but just wondering why such the popularity over on this side of the fence?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 89 points 6 months ago (2 children)

People here are far more likely to be anti-capitalist, anti-corporate, pro-privacy, etc. those groups all circle the same kind of Cory Doctorow/Matt Stoller/Luddite world where the word enshittification became popular.

[–] Maeve@kbin.social 9 points 6 months ago (2 children)

How you conflate those other things with Luddite is.... fascinating.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 34 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I assume they mean in the original term, that technology should be used to make life better, not to damage peoples employment.

[–] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I had no idea the term Luddite had any meaning beyond the colloquial definition of shunning technology in general. Thanks for giving me something to read about today.

[–] Omniraptor@lemm.ee 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

the greatest trick the capitalists ever pulled etc etc

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

I had no idea myself until just recently. The 99% Invisible podcast had a decent episode about it which I listened to that helped put it all into context.

The short story is that it was a labor movement trying to prevent mill owners from abusing workers by using automation to bleed the maximum productivity out of the fewest people. The Luddites would break into mills and smash the "infringing" machines. Tensions rose, the Luddites were eventually crushed, and the term Luddite was intentionally rebranded by capitalists to be synonymous with ignorant/anti-intellectual so that no one would ever want to associate with them again.

[–] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 23 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] Maeve@kbin.social 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Thank you for clarifying, and the link. I'll check it out!

[–] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago

Happy to! I can see why someone would be confused πŸ˜‚

[–] frauddogg@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Oh wow that's the first time in a loooooooooong minute I've seen someone use Luddite in its pre-corrupted state; I was about to be MAD AS SHIT.

[–] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Well that’s because you’re a tech-hating Luddite most likely \s

Yeah since I learned who the Luddites were I’ve kind of fallen in love with them

[–] frauddogg@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It's genuinely criminal how badly their reputations got tarred; when I heard what they were actually about I was genuinely struck like "my god there WERE people who felt the way I do". Like-- I'm literally a communist, I don't believe there will ever be a point of human existence where meaningful, dignifying labor has been 'abolished'; nor do I think we should aspire to that.

Automate away the drudgery, the sinecurial, and the tedious, sure, that's all well and good and should be done; but that which lets a person create, to make something useful, that they could be proud of? Tech shouldn't be eliminating that, and that very much feels like the future we're going toward.