this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
452 points (98.5% liked)

World News

32365 readers
675 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The United States House of Representatives has overwhelmingly passed a bill that would expand the federal definition of anti-Semitism, despite opposition from civil liberties groups.

The bill passed the House on Wednesday by a margin of 320 to 91, and it is largely seen as a reaction to the ongoing antiwar protests unfolding on US university campuses. It now goes to the Senate for consideration.

If the bill were to become law, it would codify a definition of anti-Semitism created by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) in Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

IHRA’s working definition of anti-Semitism is “a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of anti-Semitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities”.

According to the IHRA, that definition also encompasses the “targeting of the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity”.

The group also includes certain examples in its definition to illustrate anti-Semitism. Saying, for instance, that “the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor” would be deemed anti-Semitic under its terms. The definition also bars any comparison between “contemporary Israeli policy” and “that of the Nazis”.

Rights groups, however, have raised concerns the definition nevertheless conflates criticism of the state of Israel and Zionism with anti-Semitism.

In a letter sent to lawmakers on Friday, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) urged House members to vote against the legislation, saying federal law already prohibits anti-Semitic discrimination and harassment.

“Instead, it would likely chill free speech of students on college campuses by incorrectly equating criticism of the Israeli government with anti-Semitism.”

Archive link

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee -4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (5 children)

This was removed for bigotry?? Are mods following that policy already?

Edit: and the comments below it too.

Edit 2: the below comments didn't even have a call to violence. What's going on mods?

[–] Alsephina@lemmy.ml 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

The comment said "I condemn Hamas" aka the group fighting back against an occupying force and an ongoing genocide. Also said some shitty things about Gaddafi.

[–] Sagittarii@lemm.ee 19 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

They would be condemning the Viet Cong for using the exact same strategies Hamas does (taking hostages, using tunnels and guerilla warfare, etc) and having the same goal of driving out an occupying force to reunite their country, yet they had the audacity to pretend like they're antizionist.

Campus protests and the pigs dispersing them are also paralleling the Vietnam war.

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

So? Are those the magical words that justify removing any comment? Hamas isn't Palestine or Palestinians and condemning a group that killed hundreds shouldn't be a controversial statement, much less bigotry. And the irony of this happening in the thread about Isreal trying to pass a similar law for themselves..

I can understand you and other commenters expressing your opinions but the fact that not even the mods are keeping up the pretense of impartiality is insane

[–] Pollux@leminal.space 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

There is no impartiality for genocide.

The Viet Cong killed hundreds in the same way, and so have all successful revolutionary groups in the past. Decolonization is violent, if you don't like it don't colonize in the first place.

Edit: And Hamas, even with their far less precise gear and without military superiority, has done a far better job avoiding killing civilians than the occupation has. The final death toll from the Oct 7 retaliation is now thought to be 695 Israeli “civilians” (mostly unarmed IDF conscripts), 373 armed IDF members, 71 foreigners and 36 children. While Israel has killed over 30 thousand Palestinians, 2/3 of whom are women and children.

[–] miridius@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Just because one side of a conflict is evil doesn't automatically make the other side good. Evil can fight evil, and when it does we should condemn both sides. Hamas have literally said that their goal is to genocide the Israelis, if you think that's ok then that's terribly hypocritical of you. The only reason Israel is succeeding in that goal and Hamas are not is because USA is tipping the scales with their arms shipments etc

[–] Alsephina@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] miridius@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago

The Hamas Can't you see both sides are using identical arguments? Israel has also repeatedly said that their intention is to destroy Hamas, not the Palestinian people, but their actions show that that is utter bullshit of course (they even used suitcases full of cash to keep Hamas in power).

Likewise Hamas claim to only be against the Zionists in order to gain public support but their charter literally says "from the Jordan river to the sea, Palestine will be free of Jews", and there are numerous reports of them raping and murdering innocent Israelis.

Long story short, the current government of Israel and Hamas are both terrible, and supporting either of them is supporting a group whose goal is genocide. The US government is obviously extra complicit in genocide due to continuing to sell Israel weapons, but if you didn't already know that US foreign policy is pure evil then you haven't been paying attention

[–] LarkinDePark@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This guy lauds the empire's overthrow and murder of a state later resulting in untold human suffering and then condemns a peoples' resistance to a genocide. Amazing.

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee -4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

And that's bigotry? Is every comment you don't agree with supposed to be removed?

[–] LarkinDePark@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 6 months ago

I don't agree with the comment being removed. I think the fediverse is worse than reddit for its censorious childishness. But I can see why it could be considered bigotry.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

I can still see it on Lemmy world

[–] Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You can see everything here:

https://lemmy.world/modlog

Just another reason I love lemmy so much.

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

That's how I found out

Edit: but it's not helpful that the one responsible is simply listed as 'mod'