this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
58 points (91.4% liked)

Fediverse

17729 readers
159 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
deadsuperhero@lemmy.ml
wakest@lemmy.ml
58
Nice demonstration of why mastodon's dominance is problematic (hachyderm.io)
submitted 6 months ago by maegul@hachyderm.io to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Nice demonstration of why mastodon's dominance is problematic

See the conversions here:
https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/pull/4628
and
https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/federating-the-content-of-posts-note-articles-and-character-limits/4087

AFAICT, mastodon's decisions, which are arguably problematic (on which see: https://lemmy.ml/post/14973403) are literally trickling down to other platforms and infecting how they federate with each other as they dance around mastodon's quirks in different ways.

It seems like masto is ruining "the standard" with its gravity.

#fediverse #mastodon
@fediverse

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] xcjs@programming.dev 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

It's a W3C managed standard, but there are tons of behavior not spelled out in the specification that platforms can choose to impose.

The standard doesn't impose a 500 character limit, but there's nothing that says there can't be a limit.

[โ€“] Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 6 months ago

That's not what I meant. I read at some point that there's a group of people trying to build a wiki or something, so others, who want to make fediverse software, can look up best-practices and the like. They also wanted to make demo software to test the federation against, so Mastodon doesn't have to be used for that.