this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
351 points (91.5% liked)

World News

38511 readers
2811 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/15001340

"Such an invasion could lead to horrific massacres and raise scenarios of a second Nakba," the Gaza-based Palestinian Center for Human Rights said recently. "After 200 days of horrific genocidal acts in Gaza, the real objectives of the attack are the continuation of the 76-year-long ongoing Nakba and the erasure and genocidal destruction of the Palestinian people in Gaza. Israel is laying the groundwork to fulfill its settler-colonial plan of colonizing Gaza."

Human rights defenders have warned that Israel may ultimately seek to ethnically cleanse as many Palestinians as possible from Gaza.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 29 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Common Dreams can be a little much some times. Here's Politico's take which is a bit more dry.

Some important notes though. Aid groups absolutely dispute that there's an ability to fit everyone in the designated area; feed the people that can fit; and that Israel will allow everyone who wants to evacuate to do so in good faith.

So there are very good objections to this plan. If the IDF let people pass without mass arrests or randomly deciding to shoot at the people crossing their lines then that would be good. But it has not been the norm. Which brings us to the next problem. The IDF has behaved so criminally, the people of Gaza do not trust their announcements of where to go for safety.

At this point the only correct answer is an immediate ceasefire. The removal of all IDF troops from Gaza. And an international war crimes tribunal.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Only correct answer is an multi-national subjugation force to kill the IDF forces in Gaza, then push into Israel and take the current government into custody to be put on Nuremberg-style trials while setting up an interim government in Israel.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'm not a fan of Netanyahu's war crimes, but that's something that's never going to happen. Far more likely is evidence continues to go to the ICC and arrest warrants rain from the skies. Then there's a bunch of conservative Israelis who are stuck in Israel or Russia/China aligned countries. And they have to live with the knowledge that they are the new low hanging political piñata for every American president who needs a polling bump.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

yeah, the ICC doing anything/being able to hold anyone accountable is just as likely as a multinational subjugation force.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The ICC has actually managed it before though.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

against people where the biggest western powers are bending over backwards to do everything to protect them?

and actually had proper, punishing sentences?

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Oh no there are definitely novel parts to this. That's what makes it so interesting. And it's still way more likely than a multi national coalition going there without the UN.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

If there is some sort of cease fire, the UN needs to bring in a Cyprus style peace keeping force to physically stand between Israel and Palestine for a generation (or probably more).

Anything less will just lead to the same repeated outbursts of violence that we've seen for the past 70 years.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Not familiar with crypus peacekeeping. Got any info to share?

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Peacekeeping_Force_in_Cyprus

As I said, it's not a quick fix, but is has managed to keep the Greeks and Turks from killing each other there since the 1960s.

[–] hglman@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

No cause exists that can justify ejecting people in mass from there homes.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I agree. Nobody should be getting forced to go anywhere. In a "normal" war humanitarian routes would be established along with Internally Displaced People camps run to the UN standards. Those routes would be inviolate except for checkpoints to search people, and every stray round impacting near them would result in a full investigation. Aid would be flooding these camps and the entire zone behind the front lines. People would be encouraged but not required to leave within a distinct timeline.

The IDF has not done that. They've basically done the opposite of that. They want to force people to leave the area with the aid, into a camp that mathematically cannot meet UN standards. They've already said they're going to detain all men attempting to leave the area. And they routinely fire into their own humanitarian corridors. This entire operation is a war crime from the top down to the sergeants.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Gaza has like at least five years of martial law in its future during reconstruction.

Hamas is charge of the time table.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So more illegal occupation? You might get Hamas. You might.

But you are ensuring another organization rises to replace them.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world -5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Fine. Let them be replaced in due course by a legitimate form of government that is fairly elected. Sounds great to me.

You know I don't see Gaza as an illegal occupation. I did before October 7th. I find the settlements in the West Bank to be still illegal.

In my learned opinion though, after October 7, Israel has good and just cause to go to war to eliminate Hamas, the de facto government-in-hiding of Gaza, and its tunnel network. Hamas is not a legitimate government and can simply no longer remain in charge, dead or alive. I don't see anything illegal about occupation, the goal of which is to achieve that end, because n so far as Gaza ever was a state under Hamas, it is now a collapsed state with no effective government, legitimate or otherwise. It's a rump state. Irredeemable territory. And, in that case, it's the neighbor's duty to step in, establish law and order, and govern temporarily, legitimately and equitably.

Martial law is a legitimate form of interim government during a transition from hot war to reconstruction, before a provisional government of local stakeholders can decide how to form and choose a new government. No government run by the whims of a few religious people will ever be legitimate.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Hamas was fairly elected. Israel and the US were the ones that interfered because they didn't like Hamas trying to go legitimate.

And no, just no. This is not Just War Theory. In Just War Theory you don't carpet bomb residential areas. You don't make the Hospitals main targets and you certainly don't repeatedly attack and kill plainly marked journalists standing in the open. You cannot commit war crimes and then claim it falls under Just War Theory. That's the complete opposite of that theory.

And it's a collapsed state because Israel ensured that, by preventing the legitimate winners of the election from taking power peacefully, by blockading them when the people who voted for them rightfully put them in power anyways, and by repeatedly attacking them over the last couple decades, claiming any government official was a terrorist including civil servants running the basic infrastructure of the region. You cannot punch your neighbor in the face, and then move into his home on the theory that he's in the hospital now and call it a moral argument.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world -4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

What a joke. Hamas was elected, after telling people not to participate in the elections. They die take power and immediately used it to cancel all future elections.

They collapsed as their own state. Hamas corrupted everything it touched. They turned every institutiom into instrumentalities of international terrorism. They robbed the country of its whatever resources and wealth it had and used the money to launch suicide bombings and rocket attacks and to dig the tunnels which they use to smuggle fighters and rocket launching systems. Hamas big wigs are hiding under ground or living in Qatar with lavish wealth while their families are in Gaza starving.

All they had to do was reject violent extremism at any turn, and they couldn't do it. These are deranged fucking worthless people and nobody is going to miss Hamas. Anyone that does should join them.

Pan Islamist terrorists don't get to "go legit" and have their own state. Never going to happen.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Okay. I'll just repeat myself too.

And it's a collapsed state because Israel ensured that, by preventing the legitimate winners of the election from taking power peacefully, by blockading them when the people who voted for them rightfully put them in power anyways, and by repeatedly attacking them over the last couple decades, claiming any government official was a terrorist including civil servants running the basic infrastructure of the region. You cannot punch your neighbor in the face, and then move into his home on the theory that he's in the hospital now and call it a moral argument.

[–] beardown@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago