this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
253 points (98.8% liked)

Work Reform

9970 readers
9 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hildegarde@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Washington does not have "right to work" laws.

You are mistaken.

[–] treefrog@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Okay.

My point was contractors cannot be fired at will, even in right to work states where regular employees can be.

So, deactivating gig workers without cause is a breach of contract. Which you can easily sue for. And these assholes know they're wrong, so they will want to settle out of court. You don't even need a lawyer.

[–] Hildegarde@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Any competent contractor will include a termination clause in their contract. I have signed many contracts, and every single one had language to terminate the contract under some specific circumstances.

Especially with a big company like uber they can bury a favorable termination clause somewhere in the contract, and you can't exactly negotiate with an app if the terms aren't to your liking.

Companies have lawyers who get paid handsomely to write language to let them get away with things. There's no way they would be deactivating contractors if it was opening them up to significant liabilities.