this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
74 points (91.1% liked)

UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs

1239 readers
1 users here now

A community for civil discourse related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. Everyone is welcome here, from believers to skeptics and everything in between.


New to Lemmy?

See the Getting Started Guide


Want Disclosure?

Declassify UAP offers a tool that automatically finds your representatives and sends them a prewritten message.


Community Spotlight

Featured Posts and User Investigations


Useful Links


Community Rules


Other Communities

!uapmemes@lemmy.world


If you're interested in moderating or have any suggestions for the community, feel free to contact SignullGone or HM05_Me.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kaput@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

For those wondering where this sudden interest comes from, watch Dave Grush interview

https://youtu.be/x_9gTDXF9Vc?si=eVsJgFwrpmHfMECJ No matter your opinion on the subject, he is the most credible source yet

[–] refalo@programming.dev -1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

If by credible you mean full of shit.

Being in the military does not make you more/less credible.

Being in intelligence services does not make you more/less credible.

The man could be a believer, like people who trust psychics, and genuinely think what he’s saying is true. He could be struggling with mental illness and believe himself. He could be a huckster trying to make money off UFO enthusiasts ( writing a book, giving paid lectures, interviews).

He hasn’t shown evidence. That’s a serious red flag. Perhaps that evidence comes tomorrow, but all previous claims like this just fade away without evidence being shown.

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I still remain logically skeptical and also want hard evidence, but a lot of what you say doesn't make any sense.

He went under oath as a whistleblower. Book writing and doing this as a cash grab makes absolutely zero sense. If he's lying or making shit up, he's toast. He seems to know and follow the law way too well for some fancy grift.

The entire reason he's not "showing evidence" is because it's all classified and he'll be crucified. You know this, which means you are being deliberately disingenuous.

Imo he's done his job. The ball is now in the court of our ridiculously flawed and corrupt government. Why don't they grab all the 40 people Grusch interviewed? Why don't they forcefully get the answers and evidence Grusch has?

We know. It's classified. Need to know. National security.

[–] Kaput@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Most credible yet, means I don't know of anyone with more credibility. If you know of anyone else more credible I'd be glad the read about it. Also, yes having security clearance giving you access to secret documents does make someone more credible than not having that clearance. The possibility that he is full of shit out has been manipulated remains, but he is still the moist credible source yet.