this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
316 points (97.3% liked)

Selfhosted

40347 readers
411 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lemming007@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Us, selfhosters - sure.

Average person who value convenience over privacy/cost - no. They'll continue to pay and be in prisoned by the cloud.

[–] nix@merv.news 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Some might say they’re freeing themselves in a way though. Self hosting requires dedicating time you could spend doing other things especially when things break. People pay for convenience and saving time. When we simplify self hosting and updating to a point people can just download apps and press go then it will make sense for the average person

[–] mfat@lemdro.id 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This. Self-hosting doesn't need to be a nerd thing.

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Docker kinda does it by being like an app store but for servers. It's not very flexible but everyone using a particular image gets the same experience.