this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
579 points (98.5% liked)

Games

16722 readers
534 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 76 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It's the unchecked capitalism.

Better labor protection and antitrust laws would help, but the fundamental push is towards maximum exploitation of worker and customer. Power consolidates and then abuse for profit becomes easy.

[–] PseudorandomNoise@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (3 children)

It’s unchecked because customers don’t really care. When is the last time there was a boycott of a game due to how the developers are treated?

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Capitalism doesn't get checked by consumers, there are a billion things too much to properly pay attention to and no viable alternatives.

It gets checked by either regulations and laws or replacing it with something else.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

There are so many viable alternatives. I've got an increasingly long list of things I won't tolerate in games anymore, and I'm nowhere near running out of games to play. The big problem is being able to identify which of those checkboxes are checked or not; PC Gaming Wiki is working for this purpose lately, though it shouldn't be necessary.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 6 points 6 months ago

Boycotts are only one tool in the box. Legislation should be addressing things like consolidation of power and anti consumer practices.

Unfortunately, the US has one far right party that has many lunatics that don't believe in government (along with other insanities), and one center-at-best party that does that wield power effectively.

[–] kat_angstrom@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Boycott is a strong word, but I know that I and many, many others decided not to purchase Disco Elysium based on how all that drama went down. And I know I'll never buy HiFi Rush after the way Microsoft closed that studio while simultaneously lamenting how they wish they had more games like that, because I don't want to reward bad behaviour.

Same reason I haven't bought anything from EA in a decade, and I'm really on the fence about supporting Ubisoft at this point too.

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Whereas in a communist economy where people didn't have to struggle to survive, game developers could focus on improving their craft and telling whatever the funnest story they can think of is. We can already see this on a small scale with the difference between indie passion projects like Hades, and AAAA cash grabs like suicide squad. Imagine if everyone could afford to chase their passion instead of money.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 2 points 6 months ago

You could also probably get there with universal basic income

[–] BigFatNips@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Don't understand why you're being downvoted. The only thing there I disagree with is the use of the word "economy" 😂

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 months ago

Probably because leftists use "communism" like it's an immediate and obvious goal, but dismiss any criticism of past efforts to actually get there. It effectively becomes an unquestionable fantasy.