this post was submitted on 16 May 2024
1363 points (96.6% liked)

Political Memes

5436 readers
3624 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de -4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I'm certain that fewer than 0.1% of patients at a small medical clinic would share the same first and last names. In those cases, you could differentiate by address and age if necessary.

[–] Kedly@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This falls into a "if it aint broke, dont fix it" kind of thing. Month and Year Birthdate are fairly low privacy info that everyone remembers and are used to giving out" it gets used for so many different checks because we all have the understanding that we give this info out to businesses that need them, switching to other things that in a vacuum would be a better fit in that one specific category in only a tiny amount just isnt worth the confusion and pushback that changing it would cause.

[–] fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It is broken though.

You only feel like DoB is low level personal information because you tell it to everyone. According to Australian Provacy Principles it's "sensitive" which means it should only be collected when required.

At my podiatrists office it's simply not required.

[–] Kedly@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

And EVERYONE has told it to everyone for generations now, which MAKES it low level. This is not a battle worth fighting as it was lost before your grandparents were born and there are numerous other ways we could make society better that would have a lot more impact than your dentist no longer asking what year you were born

[–] fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Just because a thing has been done in the past does not mean it should be done in the future.

It's also not a "battle". It's not like stopping use of plastic or whatever. Clinics cpuld just stop collecting DoB and use some other attribute.

[–] Kedly@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

Or they could just continue doing what works for them and change nothing because almost no one cares because its not worth caring about. When you were born reveals literally nothing else about you

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I think you underestimate how common the most common first and last names are. In an even small city you are likely to see repeats of the most common names.

[–] fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Does that really matter?

Differentiate some other way.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 5 months ago

Yes, uniquely identifying the patient is important, especially for pharmacies where people with the same name might receive different doses of the same drug or receive similar sounding drugs that the patient might not catch.

What would you suggest? It needs to be a piece of information that is probably unique when paired with name at least as far as the local area, that absolutely everyone has, that the pharmacy and doctor both have and is unlikely to change (to avoid issues where records in one place are updated before the other).