1079
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 23 May 2024
1079 points (98.2% liked)
Technology
55647 readers
2569 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Why would we believe the promises of the ones who ruined the primary utility of their core product in the first place, and convinced or blackmailed the rest of the internet to take part in the ruination ? An advertising corporation will tell us to put cyanide on our pizza if it makes them an extra buck this quarter, and google is worse than that. Profit despite the social costs is doing no evil /s
Shit writes itself.
That was removed as their motto in 2015, following a restructuring of Google as a subsidiary of Alphabet.
I said it back then and I'll say it again: Calling your mega corporation "Alphabet" sounds hella distopian
The main reason for the name is that it sorts before both Amazon and Apple in the Big Tech directory. It's literally as petty as that. They obviously chose a word that was related to searching within that criterion, but still.
I thought it was because .xyz had recently become a tld and they loved the sound of abc.xyz
It's honestly weird to imagine them being concerned with branding at all because they are literally an umbrella corporation that doesn't seem to interface with customers directly. Like I never think about them and I suspect having regular people think more about them would not be good for them in any way.
"Alphabet" works for that in my head because it slides off my brain. I forget they exist until something reminds me.
It's for investors.
In that case I guess Aaron or Aardvark were too evocative of imagery and they really wanted something as antiseptic as possible.
They probably want to avoid anything that sounds like it might be Jewish, so Aaron is out. This is not because of direct anti-Semitism, but because of the fear of it. Avoiding such words avoids the subject entirely. (Ironically, the Semitic origins of the word "Alphabet" aren't as obvious.)
Aardvark is too alien and weird. Also, C-levels are deathly afraid of varking too aard.
Abacus might have been a better choice, but it doesn't come with the infuriatingly tantalising closeness of one or two letters' distance.
How about "Abysmal"?
Gee, what other organizations are called Alphabet agencies, bureaus, or depatments?
It actually wasn't, I used to think that as well, but they just moved it to a different section of their Code of Conduct, out of the Preface. Part of the reason so many people think it was removed is because of the countless headlines saying it was removed...
(from the preface)
They did violate federal labor laws by firing 3 employees who brought forth a lawsuit alleging the clause was a contractual obligation, though. So that sucks.
It may be in their code of conduct, but that’s not their motto. As of 2015, their motto is "Do the right thing."
Except it's still in their writing, just not front and center like it was before, right?
They changed it to "Do the right thing" which literally makes it less original but more importantly, more pliable, "do the right thing... for 'google'."
Im shure the CEO is "doing the right thing... for his wallet"