this post was submitted on 23 May 2024
642 points (97.2% liked)

World News

39102 readers
2305 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frezik@midwest.social 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Does Israel have much ability to project that far outside its own border? Even ignoring all the countries inbetween that aren't going to help.

[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

It is definitely an unlikely hypothetical due to both sides having allies/etc and yeah, the logistics. It would kind of be like Russia declaring war on something like... Paraguay. The problems with logistics are mostly the same on both sides though, it's just a matter of figuring out how they would fight. From there, and yes, there's a lot to think about to get to that point... but, if they were determined to fight and everyone else was determined not to intervene, Israel has a pretty clear advantage in terms of military might whichever metrics you look at.

The real interesting piece is the Spanish Navy... as in Spain does have a legitimately impressive navy and even though it's a long cruise, they could probably get to Israel with it whereas Israel does have a navy, but to my knowledge, the only area where they really excel there is with submarines. Israel would be completely outmatched in the Mediterranean if they could figure out how to fight in it.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The other side of the Med is not a long cruise for the Spanish Navy.

[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I guess it is relative, but that should be over 2000 miles, it's hard to call that short. I don't know the exact speeds of the Spanish Navy, but assuming perfect conditions and let's give them 25 knots, that's still going to run you ~4 days at top speed for the big ships.

I can't think of a better method for Spain, but it's a long enough voyage that no one's going to surprise anyone.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Well yeah. Most strategic stuff in war isn't a surprise though.

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I don't think anyone was suggesting anyone had the ability to surprise any country with the presence of an aircraft carrier. They kinda stand out. The location of every major aircraft carrier group in the world is public knowledge, there is literally no point in trying to conceal it.

[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Oh man, you all are still thinking these guys have a navy at the same level as some of the top 10, none of the countries here are big enough to worry about a real aircraft carrier. Spain kind of has a singular one with a flight deck that can hold a few harriers, but they classify it as an amphibious assault ship or use it for helicopters. It's definitely the big ship to worry about in the fleet and Spain has a pretty significant complement of larger ships, but we're talking frigates, this is not that kind of Navy.

Beyond some big ships from Spain, think mostly patrol boats and a few submarines.

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Spain is not in the top 10 strongest navies in the world obviously but it is still one of only 9 countries in the world that has a currently operational vessel capable of fielding fixed wing aircraft of any kind. 6 if you only want countries with carrier launched fighters. (3 if you don't count VTOL/SVOTL at all). And the Spanish carrier in question can field about 3 dozen harriers (and technically it's capable of launching F35s but Spain has declined to buy them)

[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

You either misread a little bit or whatever you were reading wasn't planning on getting those harriers off the deck. I'm not sure you could physically fit 36 harriers on the deck even if you didn't have to worry about flying them off/on.

It can hold a few dozen helicopters, but the space required for helicopters is not interchangeable with the space required for harriers. The aircraft numbers you probably saw is assuming you take up the whole flight deck, no space to take off and land at all, and that is assuming the helicopters are small. You can find details pretty easily online, but just do an image search, it will make it pretty obvious that you are not fitting that many harriers on that boat. They'd have to hang them off the sides.

This still is probably the ship to watch out for, but comparing it to a real aircraft carrier is rough. Also, if you count this as an aircraft carrier, there's 11 countries, maybe more depending on how you look at it. Australia has two of these that are the same class but they built and classify them exclusively as helicopter docks and don't have anything else classified as a carrier.

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

That is the pure combat composition setup, which can fit 25 airplanes below deck and 6 in parking spots on the flight deck.

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

That is the pure combat composition setup, which can fit 25 airplanes below deck and 6 in parking spots on the flight deck.

And there are 10 not 11 because Russia has one but it is not currently operational, it is undergoing repairs and retrofits and considering the focus of their military it is dubious how quickly they could field it.