Not The Onion

12180 readers

817 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

126

Arizona lawmaker says ChatGPT helped draft new deepfakes law (thehill.com)

submitted 5 months ago by Emperor@feddit.uk to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Republican state Rep. Alex Kolodin said he used ChatGPT to write a subsection of House Bill 2394, which tackles AI-related impersonations of people by allowing Arizona residents to legally assert they are not featured in deepfake videos.

“I used it to write the part of the bill that had to do with defining what a deepfake was,” Kolodin told NBC News. “I was really struggling with the technical aspects of how to define what a deepfake was,” he said. “So I thought to myself, ‘Well, why not ask the subject matter expert, ChatGPT?’”

The bill was signed into law by Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs on Tuesday. The legislation allows Arizona residents to obtain a court order stating the person identified in the deepfake video is not them.

Kolodin said that the portions ChatGPT created were precise.

“In fact, the portion of the bill that ChatGPT wrote was probably one of the least amended portions,” he said.

Hobbs was not aware of the portion of the legislation being authored by ChatGPT.

“I kind of wanted it to be a surprise once the bill got signed,” Kolodin said, noting that it was part of the plan.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

As long as he fact checked what chatgpt told him, who cares?

But he can't fact check it - he was using it because he didn't know enough about the topic to write that section in the first place.

I was suggesting ChatGPT to a social worker I know who was complaining about the number of reports he has to write - AI could bang out a first draft that he could then work up into the final report because he knows the cases and the relevant laws and procedures. If he didn't know the subject inside and out it could be dangerous. Even then, he should flag it up for others to look it over in case of hallucinations.

[–] thetreesaysbark@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

If he didn't know the subject inside and out it could be dangerous

Could be, but not necessarily. It's good to use as a starting point for further research. It's good to introduce you to terminology used in the field you're researching if you don't know it already.

Knowing what to search for is very very valuable. This can speed up your understanding of a subject significantly.