this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
850 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

55989 readers
4617 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 67 points 1 month ago (9 children)

True but ultimately this is about ownership - we don't own our games. We license them - that is what is lost with Steam and DRM, and moving away from physical media.

GOG is an alternative in that you can download and back up the installers for your games (mostly) but even then do you own your ganes?

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago (8 children)

You’ve never owned your games. You owned the media they came on but legally you only ever had a license to use the software. Depending on the license agreement (the thing where most people click “I agree” without reading) you had more or fewer rights, such as transfer of license, but the way things work legally ownership of software seems to mean the more of the copyright ownership. Maybe like a book: you own your copy of the book but you don’t have the rights to print more books or make a movie based on the book.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago (6 children)

With physical media those licenses didn't materially matter though because a contract you can't read until after a purchase is automatically void in court.

[–] piccolo@ani.social 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Copyright is automatically applied rather you want it or not. Licenses are granting you permissions to use the media without violating their Copyright. Having a physical copy simply means a publisher cant restrict access to your copy because they turned off their servers... (atleast before the age of zero day patches...).

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just FYI, you mean day zero patches. Zero days are something else entirely.

[–] piccolo@ani.social 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Actually the original meaning was the way I intended.

The term "zero-day" originally referred to the number of days since a new piece of software was released to the public, so "zero-day software" was obtained by hacking into a developer's computer before release.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

Using “updated” terms intending them as their original meaning is not usually the best plan… Like me saying “that’s an awful haircut” but using awful as the near synonym for awesome.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)