this post was submitted on 29 May 2024
508 points (94.6% liked)

World News

32315 readers
1142 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FiniteBanjo 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Meh, I've seen cooler things not get any Nobel Prizes.

[–] thrawn@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Please elaborate. It’s difficult to imagine something better than a cure that would positively affect hundreds of millions of people and would have prevented countless deaths before.

[–] FiniteBanjo 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Fact of the matter is that Diabetes is a manageable illness.

[–] thrawn@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I’m not gonna get into that line of thinking when there are literally millions of diabetes attributed deaths every year [or two if you take the lower end stats]. Please just elaborate on these alleged superior inventions that did not receive a Nobel, that’s all I was asking.

[–] FiniteBanjo 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I don't really feel like it, try back later

[–] thrawn@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

It’s okay, I obviously didn’t expect you to be able to answer that. The og comment gave off old reddit vibes, and the classic redditor wouldn’t be able to name a Nobel winning invention. I also expect you didn’t really think the Nobel committee was particularly corrupt, either you applied your worldview to it automatically or heard it somewhere unsourced and just kept repeating it without checking (possibly from a prof tho). Probably the former.

This was one of the interactions I enjoyed on old reddit before from-the-hip-bullshitting started getting buried, deleted, or too well written to be noticed. Tangentially, I wonder if reddit’s now too full of convincingly written AI bullshit for real users to bother commenting on.