this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
95 points (77.8% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

6186 readers
91 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Also, they've sucked ever since they stopped having just basic smiley faces.

Come at me!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dvoraqs@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why not Lego person instead of Lego man?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't understand the question. There are girl Lego Men and boy Lego Men.

[–] dvoraqs@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Sure, that's true, but using Lego boys and Lego girls and just Lego people in general works too and is simpler, right?

I'm sure explaining that "Man is more like human in this case and not a gender or sex" is fun sometimes but ideas are evolving with more people and eventually it will just look too much like "Man is dogwhistle for subjugating women under men by calling them men".

Is this bad connotation that more people will see over time worth holding onto the word Man as meaning everybody when we could just evolve our usage of language?