this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2024
228 points (94.2% liked)

Games

16689 readers
884 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
228
No one should have to “grow a thicker skin”: Valorant studio commit to harsh penalties for harassment (www.rockpapershotgun.com)
submitted 5 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
83 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dashi@lemmy.world 26 points 5 months ago (2 children)

The problem is you know you have to mute them/ block them after they say/ do something bad to you. When you block them it may stop them from doing that to you but it doesn't stop them from doing it to others on the game. Making it a bad experience for others.

Mute/personal blocks do not fix the root problem which is the toxic players being toxic in the game.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Ideally, enough mutes/blocks and that person would get a manual review.

I don't like automated bans because they often have false positives.

[–] Dashi@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I 100% agree with enough mutes/blocks leading to a manual thing.

Automated bans are not great but they have a time and place. Theoretically they are getting better.

My point is something should be done about these things. I don't have the answers, but something needs to be done.

[–] ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Automated bans just lead to harassment and false positives. There should only be manual review on human-operated accounts.

[–] Dashi@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

I didn't say automated bands based on reports. Yeah those lead to harassment and abuse. Obviously not a good case for automation.

But injecting code into the game with a 3rd party client could be automated if detected. That's what i meant by automated bans.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world -4 points 5 months ago

Then just block everyone before they do something bad to you. Problem solved.