People Twitter

4809 readers

1287 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a tweet or similar
No bullying.
Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

1297

Who is watching this?! (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 months ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

148 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Spaceinv8er@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Right? Like it has its moments of good and bad. I mean it's not an Oscar winner, but it wasn't so bad that I lost interest.

Tbh I thought JLo did a pretty good job.

[–] CptEnder@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Damn JLo was my main reason not to watch, historically she's just not that great. But if she pulled it off or made it kinda self-aware I'll check it out.

65 is also really good.

[–] Spaceinv8er@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

Well it's still JLo. If you aren't much a fan you won't be too impressed. Imo she can be fairly one directional in her movies.

That said, when I watch a movie that has heavy CGI I try and take a step back throughout the movie from all the special effects and evaluate an actors performance.

Ya ok sounds pretentious, but I try to imagine the environment they are in when acting. It's basically nothing but a green box, with someone off to the side reading lines.

If they can give a fairly believable performance I'm impressed, because we see all the special effects, editing, direction and production. The actor has to imagine it, and hope they don't look like a dumbass in post.

65 was alright. Wanted more dinosaurs though lol