this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2022
0 points (NaN% liked)

Movies & TV

22866 readers
108 users here now

Rules for Movies & TV Discussion

  1. Any discussion of Disney properties should contain a (cw: imperialism) tag. If your post isn't tagged appropriately it will be removed.

  2. Anti-Bong Joon-ho trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/movies and submitted to the site administrators for review.

  3. On Star Trek Sunday only posts discussing how we might achieve space communism are permitted. Non-Star Trek related content will be removed and you will be temporarily banned until the following Sunday.

Here's a list of tons of leftist movies.

AVATAR 3

Perverts Guide to Ideology

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://archive.ph/2022.03.25-133359/https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/25/opinion/oscars-movies-end.html

But the effects-driven blockbuster, more than its 1980s antecedents, empowered a fandom culture that offered built-in audiences to studios, but at the price of subordinating traditional aspects of cinema to the demands of the Jedi religion or the Marvel cult. And all these shifts encouraged and were encouraged by a more general teenage-ification of Western culture, the extension of adolescent tastes and entertainment habits deeper into whatever adulthood means today.

Over time, this combination of forces pushed Hollywood in two directions. On the one hand, toward a reliance on superhero movies and other “presold” properties, largely pitched to teenage tastes and sensibilities, to sustain the theatrical side of the business. (The landscape of the past year, in which the new “Spider-Man” and “Batman” movies between them have made over a billion dollars domestically while Oscar hopefuls have made a pittance, is just an exaggerated version of the pre-Covid dominance of effects-driven sequels and reboots over original storytelling.) On the other hand, toward a churn of content generation to feed home entertainment and streaming platforms, in which there’s little to distinguish the typical movie — in terms of casting, direction or promotion — from the TV serials with which it competes for space across a range of personal devices.

Under these pressures, much of what the movies did in American culture, even 20 years ago, is essentially unimaginable today. The internet has replaced the multiplex as a zone of adult initiation. There’s no way for a few hit movies to supply a cultural lingua franca, given the sheer range of entertainment options and the repetitive and derivative nature of the movies that draw the largest audiences.

The possibility of a movie star as a transcendent or iconic figure, too, seems increasingly dated. Superhero franchises can make an actor famous, but often only as a disposable servant of the brand. The genres that used to establish a strong identification between actor and audience — the non-superhero action movie, the historical epic, the broad comedy, the meet-cute romance — have all rapidly declined.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WhyEssEff@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] Ericthescruffy@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

George Lucas has legitimately been about 10-20 years ahead of everyone else in the industry his entire career and I am not exaggerating in the slightest. In fact that's been more then a bit of a double edged sword for him given he's always tried to roll things out before it's actually ready to fly. It's not just in vfx or film tech but also in shit like the rise of streaming.

[–] KoboldKomrade@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

Hell the prequels were basically every current marvel or star wars or disney movie, but literally 20 years ago.

[–] Michel_FouBro@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

he has unlimited funds to bank roll whatever artistic projects he wants, but all he could manage was red tails lol

[–] TheBroodian@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

Charlie Rose looks so annoyed listening to George even speak the name "Union of the Soviet Socialist Republics" lmao