888
submitted 3 weeks ago by FlyingSquid@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 45 points 3 weeks ago

Seriously. Like, okay, you think that the whole transgender thing is a fad, or "attention-seeking," or any other nonsense. Everybody is entitled to opinions, even stupid ones. I guarantee I have some stupid opinions, myself, about things that have no relevance to me.

But feeling the need to express those opinions, and feeling so strongly about it, and wanting to make legislation for it, and pretending you give two shits about girls' and womens' sports when 5 years ago you were talking shit about the WNBA because they were a joke to you, when you will knowingly interact with a trans person once or twice in a year, maybe, in your little podunk town, and since you are talking to them you won't have an opportunity to use a pronoun for them... well there's obviously something else at work here.

It makes it clear it's just an excuse to hate, because trans people don't affect them in the slightest.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 34 points 3 weeks ago

It's funny. Every time I see someone going on a rant about trans women in women's sports, I ask them when they started watching women's sports. I don't get a response, but I do get a bunch of downvotes. Even on Lemmy.

[-] lath@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago

The people complaining about trans in women's sports don't watch women's sports for the sports.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

Pretty much, which is why they don't watch women's sports except things like beach volleyball.

They tend not to be big WNBA fans.

[-] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

I watch women's hockey because I love hockey and women's hockey is more technical than men's.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

And would you throw a shit fit if a trans woman played on a women's hockey team? Because those are the people I'm talking about.

[-] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

My son started playing hockey when we was 5. There were an essentially equal number of girls and boys across the teams in our league with many hundreds of players across all the teams in all of the associations in the league. As they got older the number of girls started to drop off. Through U13 and into U15 the boys went through puberty and on average got bigger, stronger, faster, and more aggressive. In U15 we were down to 3 girls on our team. Going in to U18 we will have one. Some of the girls lost interest in hockey. Some left because they couldn't compete at the same level as the boys. Our best girls went on to play girl's hockey where they would have a more even playing field playing against other girls.

No, I don't, "throw a shitfit" when I see a male athlete playing against female athletes (and frankly, labeling anyone who doesn't agree with you as, "throwing a shitfit" completely devalues your position) but I do understand why those female athletes who choose to play female sports because they want a more even playing field and to play against other female athletes might see it as unfair to be forced to compete against a male athlete.

I absolutely believe in social equality for everyone but identifying as a woman socially and being female are two very different things.

(I'm happy to discuss this but if you start hissing and spitting about my being a TERF or a transphobe I will ignore you and block you and never give you or your opinions another thought.)

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Well then I wasn't talking about you.

this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
888 points (96.8% liked)

News

21687 readers
3552 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS