this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
923 points (92.4% liked)
Open Source
31089 readers
440 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
- !libre_culture@lemmy.ml
- !libre_software@lemmy.ml
- !libre_hardware@lemmy.ml
- !linux@lemmy.ml
- !technology@lemmy.ml
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
From what I've seen on reddit, this is sort of already happening. Lemmy's name isn't mud yet, but it's being spoken of like most of the alternatives over there: not good enough or flawed in some way. Lack of content and users is the main one that gets said about all of them, but beyond that, the negative things I see said about Lemmy most often are: "scatter-brained", "unintuitive", "tanky", "messy", "not respecting user privacy", "admins defederating and shadow banning", "having to apply to instances", "federated content not appearing the same on each instance", "lack of mod tools", "need a third party site to help find communities", etc.
And it should be said that many of the most common negative things I've seen said about Lemmy on Reddit are being addressed, but some are not. Privacy (public voting) and issues with admins erecting invisible walls in the federation through various means are not being seriously addressed as far as I've seen.
I think the main issue that will ultimately hurt Lemmy versus any other platform that comes along is that Lemmy's selling point of defederation is only a selling point to some people. Most people on Reddit don't care about centralization, they just want a platform like reddit. They'll come here and put up with it if they have too, but they will scamper off for a centralized site the moment one starts gaining traction unless Lemmy finds some way to provide something equally as unified, simple, and easy to use.
Maybe a frontend or app that just shows you everything and allows you to interact easily without worrying about logins or urls for instances, and pushes the federation aspect "behind the scenes".
I agree, and that's why I think in a few weeks/months people here will realize we can only have so many active communities at the same time.
We'll probably gather around a few core communities, and that would be it.
Lemmy is the Linux of the link aggregators, and as we all know, Linux desktop year is next year
I think some really general-purpose communities like films or books are good to be one per large instance, as they'll be busy enough to have plenty of content without them getting so big you have that Reddit thing where it feels pointless trying to contribute unless you're early.
Smaller, more niche communities definitely are harmed by being spread out as they get too quiet to survive.
It's unfortunate people want centralization and seem openly hostile when discussions are had about ways to encourage decentralization. When reddit goes down, you can't use reddit. When a lemmy instance goes down, you can simply go on other lemmy instances. That's a major issue with lemmy.world right now and it being seen as the "default" instance
in fairness, most of the whining about defederated instances is coming from the same people who turned reddit into a cesspit.
reddit was a cesspit 10 years ago, only the trash stayed after 2012
Let's say I'm browsing Lemmy.world through this frontend and I stumbled upon !privacy@lemmy.ml. Would the following be clear?