this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2024
208 points (99.1% liked)

Antiwork

8277 readers
1 users here now

  1. We're trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago (1 children)

"American CEO Robert Isom this week sent a video message offering a 17% wage increase, just enough to push new Boston and Miami flight attendants above food stamp eligibility."

So... wait... they need a 17% raise to just barely beat the food stamp threshhold?

In my state, for a single person, that's ​$29,160 a year or ​$565 a week.

Their income would have to be 24,924 a year for a 17% raise ($4,237.08) to put them barely ahead of the food stamp line, $29,161.08.

479.31 a week to 560.79 a week.

So right now they're making $11.98 an hour? The new wage would be $14.02 an hour?

Should we be tipping them now?

[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I'm not in the know so Im not sure if progress has been made in this regard, but traditionally they also have HOURS on HOURS of unpaid time, IIRC only paid for flight time basically.

Edit: https://viewfromthewing.com/why-flight-attendants-dont-get-paid-until-aircraft-doors-close/