this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
606 points (96.5% liked)

Technology

59211 readers
2751 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

i highly doubt it. I would think they're probably doing some UDP packet voodoo bullshit.

Though it likely appears as transcoded.

The sheer cost of them being transcoded into videos is immense, even if they're live encoding every video.

What happens when you get an ad you need to takedown and remove? You're on disk transcode is suddenly useless now, and you need to make a new one, easy enough, you can just do that in the background, but this also means your ads are baked into each video, which is less than ideal, unless you're constantly updating them.

And if you're doing live transcodes, that means that you have to do this for every view on every video, and i'm not sure that's sustainable.

I suppose you could probably do a cached live transcode system to bring down the overhead, but i can't imagine it's easier than just pulling some voodoo networking bullshit to literally inject an advertisement.

[–] tomalley8342@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

AFAIK there is no need to re-encode, since Youtube videos are stored and served in chunks anyways. The change is that they are now slipping in the ad chunks as if they were a part of the normal video chunk stream.

yeah that's what im saying. Re-encoding and transcoding is completely different, it's more than likely a served change, rather than a stored change.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)