this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
171 points (98.9% liked)

privacy

2972 readers
15 users here now

Big tech and governments are monitoring and recording your eating activities. c/Privacy provides tips and tricks to protect your privacy against global surveillance.

Partners:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

There is a record of you being the owner of a 1986 Fiero. Nobody needs to know the make, colour and serial number of your bike unless you register it in a system to ensure it's not stolen.

US and Canadian Intercity trains have upped security since 9/11 like everything so there is more tracking than before. You can still buy tickets with cash at least. Denser cities make it easier to blend in the crowds.

And yeah my last car had no always connected tech bullshit, and if you live in a remote area then of course, mass-transit isn't for you. Rural folks do also advocate for better city planning because it helps keep suburbanites out. Extreme cold and heat (beyond +/- 40 deg C) makes it hard but most winters and summers it can work

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There is also a record of where I live, my height, eye colour and a whole list of things. People will still be able to find me on my bike easier then in my car since I can't be that far from home on it.

You assume we all live in cities, we don't. I like how my town is set up and is walking and bike friendly, but still most drive. This post was about privacy but you got on the ol' soapbox about mass transit. Do you really think getting on a train/bus/tram you are not being/can not be tracked?

Leave your city, spread out and enjoy a bit of nature.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

You can be tracked with facial recognition, etc. but not in the same way or with the ease of a car as demonstrated in the article so I think that my point is relevant to the article. Sure some states ban or don't have traffic cameras, but in Ohio specifically, we see that a better intercity transit system could be better for privacy.

I already mentioned that sure, mass transit doesn't work as well in rural and remote areas. Clarifying my point on that: planning cities for more density, more walkability and car free travel is good for country people outside of those cities, because it keeps the suburbs from sprawling out into the countryside. These exurbs take up what could have been useful farmland with people who are just LARPing country life and spend 4 hours every day travelling to and from their job that was in the city anyway.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 5 months ago

Facial recognition needs a camera. Common but not everywhere.

The issue is police not respecting privacy at all, this does not change when on a bus.