this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2024
124 points (94.3% liked)

World News

38647 readers
2345 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Reuters.com

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

eventually, after it worked for the most part and became less relevant

That's really the issue though. Would Biden have ended it otherwise? I'm going to hold my nose and vote for the guy, but I'm not so convinced he would have.

I'm not doing a "both parties are the same" thing, I'm saying there's a long history of the next president not ending what the previous president did even if they're from the opposite party and even though what was happening was simply immoral. If anything, Trump was more of an outlier there.

So I can't say I'm assured that the Biden administration would have ended it if it was still relevant.

[–] stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub 3 points 3 months ago

Can’t agree with you any more, we’re on the same page here