this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2024
148 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

59244 readers
3831 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] aniki@lemm.ee 15 points 4 months ago (3 children)

You're right. We shouldn't use proprietary bullshit and hope the corporations do the right thing.

RISC-v is the way.

[–] Matty_r@programming.dev 13 points 4 months ago

Framework just announced a RISC-V motherboard you can get which is pretty awesome. Obviously designed for developers etc, but its a good step.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Even the RPi, which has major Linux support has a blob for its graphics driver (at least the last time I checked). And I wouldn't exactly say Broadcom is falling over themselves to support Linux. Qualcomm, less so.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

In theory yes, in practice I'm not so sure. Risc-V is BSD, so whatever company chooses to make it, can change it as they like and completely ruin compatibility.
I don't think it will work, because the BSD license doesn't protect it from whatever abuse any maker feels like.
I do follow it as a potential alternative, and alternatives are always nice.

[–] aniki@lemm.ee -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

That makes absolutely no sense. No company is going to go through all the trouble of making an entirely different processor that will need all new toolchains when risc-v is free. It's a monumental undertaking. MAYBE china, but who cares? Don't buy chinese chips.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They will make it incompatible exactly for the purpose of it being incompatible for proprietary purposes, the history of IT is riddled with examples of this being the goto strategy to maintain complete control of the ecosphere you create Apple is probably the best example of this. CPU has been an exception only because they traditionally aren't designed by the product companies.

[–] aniki@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)