this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2024
566 points (90.5% liked)

No Lawns

2003 readers
2 users here now

What is No Lawns?

A community devoted to alternatives to monoculture lawns, with an emphasis on native plants and conservation. Rain gardens, xeriscaping, strolling gardens, native plants, and much more! (from official Reddit r/NoLawns)

Have questions or don't know where to begin?

Where can you find the official No Lawns socials?

Rules

Related Communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BaumGeist@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Lawns:

  1. require artificial irrigation that contributes to depletion ofvaquifers

  2. create monocultures that reduce biodiversity and harm ecosystems

  3. require maintenance that usually involves burning fossil fuels

  4. shadeless lawns contribute to warmer neighborhoods

  5. act as nitrogen sinks

[–] MonkRome@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

I'm not a fan of lawns but I have a huge lawn that does none of these things and looks fine. I don't irrigate and my lawn is greener than the neighbors. I let anything grow and cut it long with an electric mower. Plenty of shade /w 20+ oaks covering the whole property. No idea about nitrogen, but I don't fertilize, everything that drops from trees gets mulched back into the lawn which keeps everything healthy. At least there are ways to avoid these things if you care.

[–] Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Ofvaquifers

I see you're using a Samsung keyboard

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago
  1. Not necessarily
  2. Not necessarily
  3. Not necessarily
  4. So?
  5. Okay

But there are benefits too like useable play areas, and with well maintained lawns you have a lower risk of issues like ticks etc.

I realise where I am making this argument but I just came across this and didnt realise people hated lawns.