Privacy

4371 readers

5 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

Be civil
No spam posting
Keep posts on-topic
No trolling

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

iopq@lemmy.world

457

[USA] Appeals court rules that cops can physically make you unlock your phone (reason.com)

submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by Boozilla@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.world

226 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Worth noting, with the caveat that how criminals are treated could eventually become how everyone is treated on the right slippery slope:

provisions of his parole required him to surrender any electronic devices and passcodes

[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Unfortunately the judge also ruled that it's no different than forcing someone to give their fingerprints when you book them. If this sets a precedent, it could apply to anyone getting arrested, not just parolees / prior convicts.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Not everyone, just proles.

[–] half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Ole Donnie T is technically in parole right now. Would love to see this provision applied in that case.

[–] noxy@yiffit.net 2 points 6 months ago

Wow, that is supremely fucked up. Parole shouldn't require breaching the privacy of anyone who has conversation history stored on the parolee's devices.