this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
315 points (85.6% liked)

Programmer Humor

19606 readers
775 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Feyter@programming.dev
anzo@programming.dev
BurningTurtle@programming.dev
pylapp@programming.dev
315
It's easier to remember the IPs of good DNSes, too. (lemmy.sdf.org)
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
187 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Today in our newest take on "older technology is better": why NAT rules!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Thiakil@aussie.zone 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Also for routing table reasons. Ipv6 needs to use prefixes to do link aggregation or it just gets too bjg

[–] Morphit@feddit.uk 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I can see that, but surely there wouldn't be much difference matching the first 4bits (0x2XXX, 0xfXXX) vs the first 16 (0x0001)?
0:: is presumably all for loopback-type stuff, but I don't see a reason not to use 1:: through 1fff:: and they would be much easier to type/remember/validate for public DNS servers which are needed before name resolution is available.

[–] Thiakil@aussie.zone 1 points 5 months ago

Not sure on the history of that. It would make things like that easier