this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2024
54 points (81.4% liked)

Videos

13703 readers
244 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only

  2. Follow the global rules as laid out here while posting and commenting.

  3. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] almar_quigley@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

He’s also just a bit of a prick regardless. There are so many more entertaining science personalities that don’t act pompous as fuck.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

I think "prick" is a bit far. I don't think I've ever gotten any malice or ill-intent from him. He's just a very blunt speaker who may not immediately recognize the social repercussions of what he's saying in the moment. I think he recognizes this and constantly apologizes for the way he speaks.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

he has had some dickish moments but when you’re constantly talking publicly that’s pretty inevitable unless you’re a saint.

[–] undefinedValue@programming.dev -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Not a fan of Joe Rogan but I did watch clips of his interview with Neil and prick definitely seemed like an appropriate term for him after that. Watch the clips if you don’t believe me.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I watched them. There's nothing there that is aggressive at all. He very clearly laid out and explained the issues with the ideas put forth by the ideas in that paper, and explicitly said why he did it that way (that's how a colleague in science would note things), and further said if you're to be taken seriously, you should expect such feedback from peers who are reviewing your work. That's quite accurate.

What was your take on this that sounds negative?

[–] undefinedValue@programming.dev -2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

He interrupted Joe constantly and came off as arrogant, condescending and abrasive.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qwZXR2PlcEM

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh no...Joe Rogan gets interrupted by a certified genius in between idiotic thoughts.

[–] undefinedValue@programming.dev -2 points 2 weeks ago

Hmm, so you’re now arguing in bad faith, that took a turn. I’m officially out as you seem to think it’s OK to be rude and condescend if you’re a “certified genius”. I must be speaking with a certified genius here, I had no idea.

[–] Illuminostro@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

And "uppity." Amirite, guys?!

/s

[–] almar_quigley@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes, just because I’m speaking negatively of a black man I must be racist…. Fuck off. I made no comment on his race.

[–] Illuminostro@lemmy.world -2 points 3 weeks ago

You didn't need to. There are dozens of videos on YouTube on why he's "condescending, rude, talks over Joe Rogan,' etc. You're not fooling anyone.