31
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] _different_username@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

What would be the plan to control costs? Fe2O3 nano particles aren't cheap, as you can see. At $3M per tonne and the need for, say, 10 gigatonnes to start off... That would put the cost of this plan at $30 quadrillion. I'm sure that, at that scale, the price would come down, but that's a pretty high starting point. Toss in the fact that these nanoparticles would naturally settle out over time and the costs would increase further.

No one said terraforming was going to be cheap, but at that price, there has to be a less expensive option.

this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2024
31 points (87.8% liked)

Spaceflight

460 readers
18 users here now

Your one-stop shop for spaceflight news and discussion.

All serious posts related to spaceflight are welcome! JAXA, ISRO, CNSA, Roscosmos, ULA, RocketLab, Firefly, Relativity, Blue Origin, etc. (Arca and Pythom, if you must).

Other related space communities:

Please keep memes contained to !spaceflightmemes@sh.itjust.works

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS