453

Firefox on Debian stable is so old that websites yell at you to upgrade to a newer browser. And last time I tried installing Debian testing (or was it debian unstable?), the installer shat itself trying to make the bootloader. After I got it to boot, apt refused to work because of a missing symlink to busybox. Why on earth do they even need busybox if the base install already comes with full gnu coreutils? I remember Debian as the distro that Just Wroks(TM), when did it all go so wrong? Is anyone else here having similar issues, or am I doing something wrong?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Huh? Install testing or sid?

The Debian way is to install stable then change your sources.list to either testing or unstable.

I call shenanigans.

edit: what version was Stable using before 11Jun? 'cause it's 115.12.0esr-1 right now.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

Thats not a good idea unless you do a proper upgrade (dist upgrade or similar)

It is easier to use the testing iso

[-] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

the wiki must be out of date then

[-] Anonymo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You can try this:

https://siduction.org/

Even has BTRFS setup with Snapper (or Timeshift maybe) and nala is an option.

https://www.theregister.com/2023/01/05/siduction_2022_1/ Overview.

this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
453 points (87.9% liked)

linuxmemes

19676 readers
73 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS