this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
735 points (96.5% liked)

Programmer Humor

19564 readers
1012 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] orangeboats@lemmy.world 25 points 4 months ago (2 children)

This is why I try my damnedest not to write in weakly typed languages.

string + object makes no logical sense, but the language will be like "'no biggie, you probably meant string + string so let's convert the object to string"! And so all hell breaks loose when the language's assumption is wrong.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago

You don't necessarily need types for that kind of thing though, a strict linter that flags that code works just as well

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 4 points 4 months ago

Some automatic conversion is fine.

a=3+0.2

print("Hello {name}. You are {age} years old")

That kind of thing. But the principle of least surprise definitely applies. If you get to the point where you're adding two booleans and a string, I feel like the language should at least say something. At least until the technology exists for it to physically reach out of your screen and slap you.