this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
369 points (96.9% liked)

InsanePeopleFacebook

2529 readers
52 users here now

Screenshots of people being insane on Facebook. Please censor names/pics of end users in screenshots. Please follow the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 months ago (3 children)

There is some debate over where Mecca is currently situated and where it may have been located historically.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 8 points 3 months ago

I don't normally like to deny the credibility of websites I know nothing about, however

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Maybe it never existed, and it was just the friends we mecca-long the way.

[–] StaySquared@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Wat. I think you're talking about the two different names for the same location... Mecca is in its correct location. Where the Kaaba is.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca -3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Did you read the link I posted, cause if you had you would have found out there is little to no archeological evidence that Mecca's current location matches its historical one.

[–] Jilanico@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

The article you mentioned tries to be balanced with point and counterpoint. There are some sweeping assumptions being made in that article as well.

I will say that if Mecca was Petra, many historical events occurring between mecca and medina become impossible. Battle of Badr, Uhud, etc. The tribes involved in the above events also didn't reside in Petra.

It comes across as an outsider's fun little thought experiment. Very orientalist in its approach.