1663
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] thetreesaysbark@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago

My scenario is that I use chatgpt to get context and terminology in the area I'm researching.

I then know how to do more specific Google searches (only 1/2).

[-] Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

So effectively 11-12 searches vs 2.

[-] thetreesaysbark@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

I guess it adds up to 12 searches worth of environmental impact with chatgpt+Google (10 searches worth from chatgpt, 2 from Google)

When I use Google alone it's often the same as that if not more. Sometimes it's less if I already know the subject matter, but in those scenarios I would usually give just Google a go first anyway.

Basically chatgpt often either gives me the answer or a much better starting place for what to Google.

[-] Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

I don't understand the chatgpt bit still. When you say you need more context on the subject matter, you could search for the wiki or a forum and get the same information chatgpt is pulling without the impact.

[-] thetreesaysbark@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

you could search for the wiki or a forum and get the same information chatgpt is pulling without the impact.

True, depending on the quality of the wiki/forum. I would then also often find myself defaulting back to Google to find the right page on the wiki/forum, just with the name of the forum included to narrow down my search.

That or I'd never find the exact bit of info I need because it's buried in hours worth of reading on the wiki.

this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
1663 points (96.8% liked)

White People Twitter

4465 readers
2142 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying.
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS