171
submitted 2 days ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

The first presidential debate is done and the aftermath has not been good for the incumbent, Joe Biden.

Some Democrat politicians and operatives reportedly texted CNN commentators with hopes that Mr Biden, 81, would step aside. Some floated the possibility of going to the White House and publicly stating concerns about him remaining as candidate.

But if Mr Biden were to drop out, it would be a free-for-all. There is no official mechanism for him or anyone else in the party to choose his successor, meaning Democrats would be left with an open (Democratic National Convention (DNC) in Chicago from August 19-22.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

You can't simultaneously argue that Biden is too old to be president and that we should have someone even older instead.

[-] retrospectology@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Biden isn't too old, he's too mentally incompetent and decrepit.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

Good luck convincing all the people who have spent months saying that Biden is too old to be president to accept someone even older.

[-] imaqtpie@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 2 days ago

You do realize that age is not a perfect proxy for mental competence? A good number of people remain mentally sharp well into their 90s, while others experience rapid dementia as early as their 60s.

I'm not saying his age wouldn't be a talking point, but I'm damn sure Bernie could express his platform with more clarity and vitality than Biden at this point. Unfortunately I dont think it's a real possibility, but it's stupid to act like the the actual birth date matters. It's the signs of cognitive decline that are problematic.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

When people are repeatedly arguing that Biden (and Trump as well) are too old to be president, I'm not sure why that wouldn't matter.

[-] imaqtpie@lemmy.myserv.one 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Uhh, I just explained why. People can argue whatever they want, but the actual behavior and performance of the candidate supercedes their biological age as a barometer for electability.

Also I never said it wouldn't matter, in fact I specifically acknowledged that it would be a talking point, then explained why that wasn't the most important factor at play.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

It doesn't supercede the "he could die at any time" part of the argument, which sure seems to be a big one.

Look, I get that you like Bernie. I like Bernie. But when you argue that Trump and Biden are too old to be president, you can't suddenly say this older guy is not too old to be president. And it has been about "too old." Go do a search for "Biden too old" or "Trump too old" if you don't believe me.

[-] imaqtpie@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 2 days ago

Trump, Biden, and Bernie are all too old. They could all die at any time, and thus it's not an effective political argument for either side.

The reason why Biden is being attacked from that angle more effectively is because he is showing signs of dementia. That's a whole other issue aside from the likelihood of death.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

I never argued Biden was too old.

But if I had I would have argued that of any candidate in that age group, Bernie could defy the odds as far as ageism goes.

this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
171 points (79.2% liked)

News

21676 readers
3027 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS