this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
414 points (90.4% liked)

World News

32521 readers
877 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Mitch McConell says the quiet part out loud.

Exact full quote from CNN:

“People think, increasingly it appears, that we shouldn’t be doing this. Well, let me start by saying we haven’t lost a single American in this war,” McConnell said. “Most of the money that we spend related to Ukraine is actually spent in the US, replenishing weapons, more modern weapons. So it’s actually employing people here and improving our own military for what may lie ahead.”

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/4085063

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mim@lemmy.sdf.org 163 points 1 year ago (136 children)

Russia invades a neighbour who dares to attempt to have stronger ties to the west.

West supplies neighbour with weapons to defend itself.

Tankies on Lemmy: "oh no, Russia is being oppressed"

[–] Rom@hexbear.net 58 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Angry libs on lemmy downplay CNN poll showing majority of Americans oppose more US aid for Ukraine

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] barrbaric@hexbear.net 49 points 1 year ago (134 children)

At a 2008 summit, NATO stated that it would attempt to expand to include Georgia and Ukraine, despite Russia having stated that NATO membership for those countries was a red line for them. Georgia was immediately invaded by Russia in response. Imo this makes it clear that NATO membership for either of those countries was so unacceptable that Russia would rather invade.

If we assume that Russia (and Putin in particular) is acting violently and irrationally like a wild animal, why did NATO continue to agitate Russia when the only possible outcome would be violence? Surely a neutral or even Russia-aligned Ukraine would be preferable to a war-torn Ukraine? This is proof that the US and NATO don't care about the average person actually living in Ukraine, and indeed don't care about the Ukrainian state beyond it being a useful (and profitable) proxy against a geo-political rival.

To be clear, I'm not excusing Russia here, but geo-politics aren't about what's "fair" or "right", and if they were, the US would be a global pariah.

load more comments (134 replies)
[–] ThereRisesARedStar@hexbear.net 47 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The US dares to coup a democratically elected government, and then its neighbor invades at the behest of people the new government were persecuting after two different ceasefires are broken by Ukraines puppet government.

Dronies be like "oh no our wholesome smol bean azov fighters are being oppressed"

[–] Quimby@hexbear.net 44 points 1 year ago

"And that's all I have to say about that." fedposting

You straight up butchered that straw man

He is in pieces

How could you do this

[–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 35 points 1 year ago

Tankies on Lemmy: "oh no, Russia is being oppressed"

Literally no one thinks this, but by all means, have fun in your fantasy land lol

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 31 points 1 year ago

You're commenting on an article explicitly saying the US isn't sending weapons for the purpose of defending Ukraine...

load more comments (129 replies)